Help needed: ports builds on 10.X but breaks on 9.X
A.J. "Fonz" van Werven
freebsd at skysmurf.nl
Tue Oct 27 16:38:28 UTC 2015
Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> The real question that informs the decision is: Might/Do the people
> using the quarterly want/need this?
> A really way to get a better feel is to browse the quarterly commit log:
> However, if you're unsure, it's appropriate to set the merge-quarterly
> flag to ? *any time* you think that (or are not entirely sure whether) a
> change/issue may need to be committed to quarterly. Really.
> We'd rather quarterly become high value and deal with a few more issues
> that have the flag incorrectly set (and deny the request), than missing
> commits/fixes that go into head that should be merged, but aren't.
Thanks a bunch, it looks pretty clear to me.
I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the freebsd-ports