ccache's cleanup algorithm

Tue Nov 3 14:09:22 UTC 2015

On 03/11/2015 13:26, Scott Bennett wrote:
> If it's really using LRM instead of LRU,
> can anyone explain why?

It's fairly common to mount filesystems noatime -- it's the default for
ZFS setups created by the installer nowadays I believe, plus it is
common on other unix-like OSes.  Which means tracking atime is quit
likely to be useless for ccache.  Tracking mtime may simply be the next
best alternative.

	Cheers,

	Matthew

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 957 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20151103/e298ea37/attachment.bin>