Fwd: Re: svn commit: r386904 - in head/www/apache22: . files

[Adam McDougall]

It still didn't work.  Cannot load
/usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so into server:
/usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so: Undefined symbol "get_dh2048"

Additionally I'm concerned about the validity of renaming small primes
and using them as if they were for much larger dh.  When I do google
searches for dh3072_p and dh2048_p I find larger sets of numbers.
Renaming the existing primes doesn't feel right and worries me.

On 06/02/2015 07:51, Ryan Steinmetz wrote:
> Adam,
> 
> Please test the following patch.  It should be placed in the files
> directory and should resolve the error you saw.
> 
> https://people.freebsd.org/~zi/patch-modules_ssl_ssl__engine__dh.c
> 
> You can then build the build as usual after running a 'make clean'
> 
> -r
> 
> On (06/01/15 14:47), Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 5/31/2015 8:29 AM, Adam McDougall wrote:
>>> Is anyone else getting this issue?  I had to revert the change on my
>>> systems.
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>
>> Yes it looks incomplete. Nothing is providing get_dh2048.
>>
>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:static DH *get_dh512(void)
>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:static DH
>>> *get_dh1024(void)
>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:        dh = get_dh2048();
>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:        dh = get_dh3072();
>>> work/httpd-2.2.29/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_dh.c:        dh = get_dh3072();
>>
>> The module is only providing 512 and 1024 but not 2048 and 3072 symbols.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Regards,
>> Bryan Drewery
>>
> 
> 
>