www/squid's cache dir

timp timp87 at gmail.com
Wed Jul 15 14:33:03 UTC 2015

> > Ok, so you don't see the difference too, do you? 
> Actually I do see the difference - I think the current layout is 
> better. My point was that "I can't see any difference" isn't a good 
> argument for making disruptive change. 
> I think it's obvious that putting multiple caches under one squid 
> directory is better than having multiple squid directories. 

Well, yes, in most cases.

> > The point is get rid of dirs which we don't really need for this port, 
> > and place cache to suitable dir which is made in base system for such 
> > purposes. 
> > Just for order. You think it's bad idea? 
> I think it's cleaner to have a default location for squid caches, 
> rather than just a default cache location.   There's an unnecessary 
> directory to the same extent as there is with a single home directory 
> under /home.   
> Whether squid goes under /var or /var/cache is a completely different 
> issue. In the second case you would need /var/cache/squid/cache. 

I like the /var/cache/squid/cache variant =) It looks too long though.

About a half of a year cache dir was hided a bit deeper.
Is it your commit? Sorry, I can't see your name, just a name of mail list.

Do you think logs should be under /var/squid too (now empty /var/squid/logs

> Please don't top-post.

I'm sorry! I'll do my best.

Does anyone have any other opinion?

View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/www-squid-s-cache-dir-tp6025127p6025493.html
Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list