www/squid's cache dir

[timp]

Ok, so you don't see the difference too, do you?
The point is get rid of dirs which we don't really need for this port,
and place cache to suitable dir which is made in base system for such
purposes.
Just for order. You think it's bad idea?

2015-07-15 14:08 GMT+03:00 freebsd-ports mailing list [via FreeBSD]
<ml-node+s1045724n6025455h90 at n5.nabble.com>:
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 21:39:39 -0700 (MST)
> timp wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> > Squid can use more than one cache directory, so it makes sense to
>> > have the default cache directory as a sub-directory of squid/.
>>
>> Additional cache dirs can be created manually by user in /var/squid, I
>> agree. Like /var/squid/cache{1,2,3} etc whatever.
>> But these dirs can be created manually in /var/cache too. Like
>> /var/cache/squid{1,2,3}. I can't see any difference.
>
> If you can't see any difference, what the point's in making a change?
> _______________________________________________
> [hidden email] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
>
>
> ________________________________
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/www-squid-s-cache-dir-tp6025127p6025455.html
> To unsubscribe from www/squid's cache dir, click here.
> NAML




--
View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/www-squid-s-cache-dir-tp6025127p6025458.html
Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.