testing the value of ${CXX} in ports Makefile

Chris H bsd-lists at bsdforge.com
Fri Jan 30 15:04:33 UTC 2015


On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:30:10 -0800 "Chris H" <bsd-lists at bsdforge.com> wrote

> On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 22:46:32 -0800 (PST) Don Lewis <truckman at FreeBSD.org>
> wrote 
>
> > On 29 Jan, Chris H wrote:
> > > On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:43:38 -0800 (PST) Don Lewis <truckman at FreeBSD.org>
> > > wrote 
> > >> I need to test the value of ${CXX} in the Makefile for a port and am
> > >> getting unexpected results.  Here is a simplified version of the
> > >> Makefile:
> > >> 
> > >> PORTNAME=    junk
> > >> PORTVERSION=    0.0.0
> > >> CATEGORIES=    devel
> > >> DISTFILES=
> > >> 
> > >> MAINTAINER=    truckman at FreeBSD.org
> > >> COMMENT=    junk
> > >> 
> > >> USE_GCC=    4.9+
> > >> 
> > >> .include <bsd.port.pre.mk>
> > >> 
> > >> post-patch:
> > >>     echo CXX=${CXX}
> > >> .if ${CXX} == g++49
> > >>     echo detected g++49
> > >> .else
> > >>     echo did not detect g++49
> > >> .endif
> > >> 
> > >> .include <bsd.port.post.mk>
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> If I run "make patch", this is what I get:
> > >> 
> > >> # make patch
> > >> ===>   junk-0.0.0 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found
> > >> ===> Fetching all distfiles required by junk-0.0.0 for building
> > >> ===>  Extracting for junk-0.0.0
> > >> ===>  Patching for junk-0.0.0
> > >> echo CXX=g++49
> > >> CXX=g++49
> > >> echo did not detect g++49
> > >> did not detect g++49
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> If I run "make -dA patch" and look at the debug output, I observe
> > >> bsd.gcc.mk getting processed after the .if is evaluated.  When the .if
> > >> is processed, the value of ${CXX} is still c++.  It sort of looks like
> > >> bsd.gcc.mk isn't getting included until bsd.port.post.mk and we are
> > >> relying on lazy expansion to get the correct value of ${CXX} for the
> > >> actions.
> > >> 
> > >> It sort of looks like I'll have to do something like:
> > >> 
> > >> post-patch:
> > >>     [ ${CXX} = g++49 ] && echo detected g++49
> > >> 
> > >> but that just seems goofy.
> > > I'm not attempting to come off as any sot of expert. But it
> > > seems like you're going the long way around. Couldn't you
> > > just as easily REQUIRE, or perhaps even better; simply reverse
> > > the logic;
> > > 
> > > if ${CXX} != g++49
> > > @VOMIT
> > > endif
> > > 
> > > It'd be shorter, and still assures the results you require,
> > > no? Just a thought.
> > 
> > gcc46, gcc47, gcc48, and probably gcc5 (haven't tested that one yet) all
> > work.  gcc49 requires a source patch.  I just want to be able to set
> > USE_GCC=yes and not have the port break when the default version of gcc
> > gets changed to 4.9.
> > 
> > The way that the ports infrastructure is written, it looks like I can't
> > do the test with a Makefile .if / .endif.  It looks like I have to do it
> > in the shell code in actions for the target.
> > 
> > Instead of using [ condition ] && do something, I could also write it as
> >     if [ ${CXX} = g++49 ]; then apply the patch; fi
> Ahh. Sure. It's also shorter than the only alternative I can conceive
> if ${CXX} <= g++48 || if ${CXX} >= g++50
Ahem... That *should* have read
if ${CXX} <= g++48 || ${CXX} >= g++50
Sorry for the noise. In the future, I'll try to refrain from
sending email until *after* my first cup of coffee. :(

> @${PATCHME}
> endif
> 
> --Chris
> 
> --
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"




More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list