poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages?

Lowell Gilbert freebsd-ports-local at be-well.ilk.org
Tue Jan 13 14:55:06 UTC 2015


Matthew Seaman <matthew at FreeBSD.org> writes:

> poudriere only knows that the dependency changed.  In effect, to find
> out if the package of interest would be changed because of that, it has
> no other recourse than to build the package.  Now, if you can come up
> with some heuristics whereby you can examine the changes to a port and
> determine that they will not cause significant downstream changes, and
> do that reliably and faster than just rebuilding the package, then I'm
> sure the poudriere developers would be eager to incorporate them.
>
> Failing that, poudriere re-building everything that might be affected is
> the sensible choice.

If I know that only the actually changed ports need to be rebuilt, I go
into my jail but instead of running poudriere, I use "portmaster -g".

Unfortunately, it's really easy to be wrong about "knowing" that.


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list