Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKs

[Matthew Seaman]

On 2015/08/24 14:20, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> have no LATEST_LINK strings, not duplicate values as falsely asserted.

Nothing has LATEST_LINK strings any more.  The whole concept of
LATEST_LINK is gone now. The mass email was triggered because of a
forgotten monitoring script that was confused by every port returning
the same, empty, value for LATEST_LINK.

Every port maintainer would have received a similar email, which served
no purpose whatsoever (other than to reveal a number of maintainer
e-mail accounts that didn't work any more) and which everyone should
simply ignore.

	Cheers,

	Matthew



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 972 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20150824/72410c00/attachment.bin>