Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug

Jung-uk Kim jkim at FreeBSD.org
Wed Apr 1 21:32:38 UTC 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 04/01/2015 17:21, Yuri wrote:
> On 04/01/2015 14:17, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>> I know bsd.openssl.mk has been broken for very long time.  For
>> example,
>> 
>> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50108FEF.3030405
>> 
>> However, I am not sure whether entirely removing it is the best
>> way going forward.
> 
> I mean, removing of the dependency on base. Ports should use only 
> openssl port.
> 
> If you think this isn't a good idea, and ports should still
> occasionally use base openssl, would you care to explain why you
> think so?

I don't like to see adding "-Wl,-rpath,${LOCALBASE}/lib" to LDFLAGS
for all ports depending on libcrypto, etc.  If it is moved to separate
directories first, then it makes some sense, though.

Jung-uk Kim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVHGPwAAoJEHyflib82/FGX8YIAIefRcO47zRHmojZ4E0gS15J
Y4bWyCFFVpIjuEDW4kQ6mFK83lJz9DD+KWfn/FFJrxAvmFpKnw4jJ8UtqsH1KuRp
o9fXPH6TGVZqvM33KCWSdDBKw/7Pu29gQjxnHmN5R8aa96oTYA7yR09BWAKcQs37
ZOrwJBcKKt03KZtvYYkc3GeK5oKKIuC1DNporYzoWFCKzrtzKDIUBJgPIePrWF6a
QGvZe85D9nwk5WCoVAw26FHV4sGpd7DMFxgkm5EfiYVvte9El3rDrIRkLLxkYqzV
C3M7pbuQ8Uf9gGUcuBnrfpWU42jVGNjvpq2w7sBQAJibeOh1TlwaDLNtS7H5ctU=
=+7Bt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list