[BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life

[Tijl Coosemans]

On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:50:30 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin <bapt at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:56:14PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:25:39 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin <bapt at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>> On of the most borring thing IMHO in the plist maintainance is all the
>>> directories.
>> 
>> Another idea is to support shell glob patterns (*?[) in pkg-plist.  This
>> is possible now thanks to staging.  It would allow moving PORTDOCS,
>> PORTDATA and PORTEXAMPLES to pkg-plist.  But more importantly, it would
>> allow automatic plists that some ports create in post-install to be
>> turned back into a real pkg-plist.  Without glob patterns some pkg-plists
>> are just too long or too complicated depending on options.
> 
> We could also say pack everything that is in that stage directory.
> 
> The problem is right now I do like static plist because if something
> fails to build for $reason, that the plist doesn't find a file in the
> staging area and we notice quite quickly that something as failed.
> with autoplist or globbing we do lose this feature and we need to way
> deal with it.
> In anycase we won't make full autoplist because we still need to be
> able to specify credentials files per files if needed. But glob is
> really appealing :)

I completely agree :)  Files should be listed explicitly if possible,
but sometimes it's very inconvenient and in these cases some ports
roll their own autoplist implementations which worse than having a
static pkg-plist with a few glob patterns.

Moving PORTDOCS etc. to pkg-plist means all package content is listed
in one file.  That will probably simplify check-plist too.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20140903/5615d1ea/attachment.sig>