Update of security/gnupg fails because of conflict with security/dirmngr

A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven freebsd at skysmurf.nl
Sat Nov 29 12:56:42 UTC 2014


Yuri wrote:

> ===>   Registering installation for gnupg-2.1.0_1 as automatic
> pkg-static: gnupg-2.1.0_1 conflicts with dirmngr-1.1.0_12 (installs 
> files into the same place).  Problematic file: /usr/local/bin/dirmngr

Yes, that sort of thing seems to be happening a lot lately. I found out
that it often helps if you temporarily uninstall the offending port, then
install the other one and finally reinstall the uninstalled one. Or in
your case:
1. delete dirmngr (remember if it takes anything else with it!)
2. install gnupg;
3. reinstall dirmngr again (as well as anything that got deleted with it).

Hope that helps.

However, considering that this sort of thing occurs commonly these days, I
suspect there must be something wrong in the ports infrastructure. What I
also find somewhat mindboggling is how ports are built, staged and
packaged entirely, only THEN to discover there's a conflict. Couldn't that
have been detected way earlier?

AvW

-- 
Imbibo, ergo sum.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20141129/5ef67b14/attachment.sig>


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list