mail/courier build failures on newer FreeBSD versions

Milan Obuch freebsd-ports at dino.sk
Sun May 25 20:51:55 UTC 2014


On Sun, 25 May 2014 22:43:14 +0200
Kurt Jaeger <lists at opsec.eu> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> > > > In the mean time, could someone review PR ports/190209 which
> > > > addresses this issue
> > > > (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190209)? It is
> > > > really simple and should solve package builder failures for
> > > > [REL - 10i386-default], [REL - 10amd64-default], [REL -
> > > > 10i386-quarterly], [REL - 10amd64-quarterly], [REL -
> > > > head-i386-default] and [REL - head-amd64-default].
> > > 
> > > The commit system rejects ports which are still unstaged, so we
> > > we need a patch which also addresses staging.
> 
> > > As far as I understand, you are the maintainer ?
> 
> > Yes, I just use unique addresses for mailing lists...
> > 
> > Patch for stage is in works, but as mail/courier is a complex port,
> > I need to investigate various cases. Currently I work on pkg-plist,
> > and some questions will come, I am sure.
> 
> Do you also plan to upgrade to 0.73. ? With 0.65 we're badly behind
> the times, aren't we ?
>

Yes, this upgrade is long due, but it has some issues too. So I would
like to work on it in a step by step manner... it looks like staging is
actually prerequisite now :(

> > I just do not like to submit uncomplete work, and patch mentioned
> > solves the other issue, and being simple...
> 
> Well, I have a patch for eclipse-devel, which is not accepted,
> because it's not staged either. So I'm in the same situation 8-}
> 

It's a pity... anyway, I am working on it, however slowly...

Milan


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list