FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

Michelle Sullivan michelle at
Sat May 24 21:33:42 UTC 2014

Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>> They just need converting to a staged environment?  If so if you'd like
>> to take a look at: and
>> tell me if I did it right and tell me how I can choose something that
>> no-one is working on I'll crack on with some of them.
> I test-build the stuff you submitted and it looks fine.

Good I'm on the right track then.. that's the important thing - knew it
built - but wasn't sure if it was 'correct' for staging etc.. (no build
errors != right, just that it might be ok ;-) )
> What's the reason there are so many different pgpool-II ports ?
> Can they be consolidated ?
Don't know - I can understand 2.x and 3.x and a 3.x-devel - but no idea
why so many otherwise.

>>> Provide PRs, send me a Cc: and I can have a look at them.
>> I'm happy to help when I have time (today I could have probably got
>> through 10 'easy' ones).. however having never done it before and no
>> actual feedback of what I have done as I have now updated 2 (one new
>> one, one add a patch to an existing one) .. I don't know if I'd even get
>> it right...  that said my poudriere VMs and jenkins are not complaining
>> about what I have done (I patch auto-manually (scripted) after each
>> portsnap)
> I think the pgpool one is fine! Have you've been in contact
> with the maintainer for pgpool-II, kuriyama@ ?
No response so far - coming up on 2 weeks (bit more for 'official
contact' I think.)


Michelle Sullivan

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list