How are ports built now
Kevin Phair
phair.kevin at gmail.com
Sun Jun 8 15:38:39 UTC 2014
On 6/8/14, 11:20 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On June 7, 2014 at 11:16:04 PM +0200 olli hauer <ohauer at gmx.de> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Do you see which port is looping?
>> Perhaps a port was moved / renamed / removed and portmaster therfore is
>> looping around
>>
>> Sadly I cannot help more since I used all the years tinderbox /
>> poudriere
>> to build packages.
>>
>
> I've been working on this for two days now, so the parameters have
> changed a bit. But here's an example of what prompted my question:
>
> This is the result of portmaster -ad
>
> ===>>> All >> (18)
>
> [[stuff]]
>
> ===>>> Proceed? y/n [y] n
>
> This is the result of pkg upgrade -n
>
> # pkg upgrade -n
> Updating repository catalogue
> Upgrades have been requested for the following 150 packages:
>
> [[different stuff]]
> The upgrade will require 426 MB more space
>
> 373 MB to be downloaded
>
> Clearly portmaster and pkg upgrade disagree on what work needs to be
> done.
>
Do you have non-default port options configured? I believe the packages
are all created with the default options, so that if you've installed
everything from ports, and some of those ports with non-default options,
your dependencies when upgrading with portmaster could end up looking
different than when upgrading with pkg.
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list