Apache 2.4 must become default NOW
olli hauer
ohauer at gmx.de
Sun Jul 6 22:27:50 UTC 2014
On 2014-07-05 19:09, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> given ports@ ist listed as maintainer, you get the email. The Subject says it. The world has moved on; in March I had a hard time arguing, in July I just cannot anymore. We must switch to 2.4; whatever breaks needs fixing, but somehow other distributions have managed and we did not and keep screwing our users missing a lot of security features.
>
> Please fix!
>
> —
> Bjoern A. Zeeb "Come on. Learn, goddamn it.", WarGames, 1983
Hi Bjoern,
nothing against this change, except your complain comes a little bit late.
The portstree was already tagged for 9.3 some days ago so this change would be a possible issue for all users using the 9.3 packages.
Before the default version can be changed a full expr. run by portmgr@ is required and all possible issues should be fixed.
Unluckily we have a rolling ports tree (not like RHEL and others where such a change happens during new major releases) so there should be also a time frame to warn users about such a change.
I remember endless discussions about the removal of apache13 after it was already deprecated nearly one year after upstream deprecation ...
--
olli
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list