Portmanager vs portupgrade

Ajtim lumiwa at gmail.com
Thu Jan 23 13:55:24 UTC 2014

On Thursday 23 January 2014 13:08:17 RW wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 12:39:59 +0000
> Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > maintained by the same people (bdrewery mostly).  portupgrade requires
> > you to install ruby as well: that's probably the biggest deciding
> > factor still extant. 
> For me the biggest factor is that portupgrade doesn't stop on the first
> error, it carries on building ports that don't depend on failed ports
> and then presents a summary of the problems at the end. 
> This is a big advantage on desktop installations where there are a lot
> more ports and they are generally less reliable.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"

I am portmaster user from FreeBSD 7.0 and I want to switch to portupgrade. Should I expected some problems becaue everything is install with portmaster?

Thank you.


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list