hal, ntfs, and 10.0-RC3
Kevin Oberman
rkoberman at gmail.com
Sun Jan 5 21:02:07 UTC 2014
Since I updated to 10.0-RC3 (from 9), hald no longer works with my ntfs
partitions. I can mount them manually with ntfs-3g, but when not mounted,
hal does not see them at all.
> ls /dev/ntfs
Lenovo_Recovery SYSTEM_DRV Windows7_OS
> gpart show ada0
=> 63 1465149105 ada0 MBR (699G)
63 1985 - free - (993K)
2048 2457600 1 ntfs (1.2G)
2459648 958765056 2 ntfs (457G)
961224704 471040000 3 ebr (225G)
1432264704 32878592 4 ntfs (16G)
1465143296 5872 - free - (2.9M)
> lshal | grep ada0
block.device = '/dev/ada0' (string)
freebsd.device_file = '/dev/ada0' (string)
> lshal | grep Windows7
Exit 1
I mount on NTFS partition and:
> lshal | grep ada0
block.device = '/dev/ada0' (string)
freebsd.device_file = '/dev/ada0' (string)
block.device = '/dev/ada0s1' (string)
block.device = '/dev/ada0s2' (string)
block.device = '/dev/ada0s3' (string)
block.device = '/dev/ada0s5' (string)
block.device = '/dev/ada0s4' (string)
> lshal | grep Windows7
block.device = '/dev/ntfs/Windows7_OS' (string)
info.product = 'Windows7_OS' (string)
volume.label = 'Windows7_OS' (string)
After a umount, all slices vanish again.
Might this be fall-out of the removal of ntfs (read-only) support? I have
not looked through the hald sources to see how it detects these slices. I
do find it interesting that mounting one NTFS file system causes all of the
other ones appear to hald.
Any suggestions?
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
E-mail: rkoberman at gmail.com
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list