10.0-release jail on head-hosted tinderbox (Was: Re: 10.0-hosted tinderbox: 8.4 builds broken?)
Joe Marcus Clarke
marcus at freebsd.org
Sat Feb 8 20:17:10 UTC 2014
On 2/7/14, 2:18 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 01:36:45PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
>> It appears that really weird SRCBASE assumptions are made throughout the
>> code. I'll have to put a temporary hack in to just make SRCBASE appear
>> inside the chroot whatever it's set to. Setting and unsetting SRCBASE just
>> breaks different things in weird ways, and this is the only reliable fix
>> I've found.
>> Joe, please can I stick this in, and merge to the beta?
>> Alexey, try this patch. This one definitely works for me, and gets the
>> dependencies working correctly.
> Can be unrelated, but I've been observing some bad behavior with fresh
> tinderbox code from CVS and equally fresh -CURRENT (just tried again
> today): install FreeBSD/amd64, 'cvs up', rebuild world/kernel (GENERIC),
> cvs co tinderbox, create jails for 10.0-RELEASE and 9.2-RELEASE. Builds
> for 9.2 work fine; trying to build anything for 10.0 always fails in a
> similar way (take a look at attached make.0 file). I've seen this on
> i386/non-zfs as well. Particularly, these lines look bad:
> /buildscript: pkg-static: not found
> tar: Error opening archive: Failed to open 'pkg-1.2.6.txz'
> /buildscript: ./pkg-static: not found
> error in dependency pkg-1.2.6.txz, exiting
This part looks weird:
skipping package pkg-1.2.6.txz for pcre-8.34 since it is missing
Why wasn't pkg built? It appears the Makefile was generated correctly
to a point. Pcre should depend on pkg. What does the Makefile look
like? Do you have any logs for the pkg package build?
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome at FreeBSD.org
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
More information about the freebsd-ports