Another pkg showstopper-- more information
Steven Hartland
killing at multiplay.co.uk
Fri Dec 12 18:28:00 UTC 2014
Unless I'm missing something you don't actually provide any information
about the issue your actually seeing?
I personally have already updated 10 or so boxes with a wide range of
packages to pkg 1.4 and apart from a change with the handling of pkg
upgrade -f <pkg>, which was an intended fix, I didn't have any problems.
So not sure what your "show stopper" is or what you think could be
tested more thoroughly (don't forget the call for testing did go out the
other week, so looks like there was quite a bit of opportunity to get
involved.
Regards
Steve
On 12/12/2014 18:20, Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports wrote:
> Reverted to pkg, by build, and FORCE PKG REGISTER.
>
> pkgs still cannot be installed.
>
> Still stuck with ports ( however portupgrade -- non-packages -- seems to be
> working with this pkg << pkg-devel downgrade )
>
> (/ portmaster? == no, cannot get
> handle, lock on database) only.
>
> ..............###########...............##################...........
>
> Should pkg and/or pkg-devel be more thoroughly tested before
> release into the tree? No other pkg usually hints at similar pkg
> system(s) breakage without a proven recovery/rollback procedure
> already documented... similar to what portupgrade does with its
> saving of shared libraries prior to upgrade of a port.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list