New Netdisco2 port and multiple port submission question

[geoffroy desvernay]

> Hi Geoffroy,
> 
> Either (shar/diff) is fine, but diffs can help with (inline) review, or
> in the event further changes are needed.
> 
> With svn diffs, you can also include changes such as adding the ports to
> the relevant category/Makefile as well (which are needed for new ports),
> save committer time, and gets you familiar with our side of the process.
> 
Well, I'll try this way then :)

> The multiple ports question is less concrete, as its a balance between
> overhead per PR (with perhaps a single committer), and isolated changes.
> 
> If it were me, I'd create a single issue report, with one patch per
> port, named perfectly (with descriptions)
> 
> Mention in the submission which are dependencies of which and go from there.
> 
> More important than submission formats however, are:
> 
> - portlint output is clean (see ports-mgmt/portlint)
Already portlint lover…
> - Build/Package QA and tested with poudriere or redports
> 
…and in process of configuring poudriere for QA :)

> Jump on #freebsd-ports (freenode) or #bsdports (efnet) if you have any
> questions, and have fun!
> 

Thank you !
-- 
*geoffroy desvernay*
C.R.I - Administration systèmes et réseaux
Ecole Centrale de Marseille

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20140827/5d3b1768/attachment.sig>