HEADS UP: Berkeley DB 4...4.7 port removals/upgrades may require manual preparation
Dennis Glatting
freebsd at pki2.com
Sun Aug 24 14:46:30 UTC 2014
On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 15:08 +0200, olli hauer wrote:
> On 2014-08-24 14:37, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:30:06 +0200
> > Kurt Jaeger <lists at opsec.eu> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >>>> Hm, using USE_BDB=$numble looks wrong to me in devel/ice.
> >>>>
> >>>> Can you test the following patch.
> >>>>
> >>>> Index: Makefile
> >>>> ===================================================================
> >>>> --- devel/ice/Makefile (revision 365910)
> >>>> +++ devel/ice/Makefile (working copy)
> >>>> @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@
> >>>> .endif
> >>>>
> >>>> USES= iconv gmake
> >>>> -USE_BDB= 5
> >>>> +USE_BDB= yes
> >>>> +WANT_BDB_VER= 5
> >>>> INVALID_BDB_VER= 40 41 42 43 44 46 47 48 6
> >>>> USE_LDCONFIG= yes
> >>>> BUILD_WRKSRC?= ${WRKSRC}/cpp
> >>
> >>> @Kurt: Could you test and confirm? If this works, I'll commit the
> >>> patch.
> >>
> >> Yes, it builds.
> >>
> >
> > I created a commit request
> >
> > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D679
> >
>
> Kurt, or you can commit this even w.o. PR.
> The patch does not break anything but allows the port to build as required.
> I assume there are even more easter eggs in the tree, specially for USE_BDB.
>
Yep:
root at Junker# more databases/evolution-data-server/Makefile
...
USE_BDB= 41+
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list