Building interactive ports with poudriere

[Chris Rees]

On 18/08/2014 06:21, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Sunday, August 17, 2014 a las 07:21:06PM -0500, Greg Rivers escribió:
> 
>> What's the proper way to tell poudriere to accept a license?
>>
>> Example:
>> # DISABLE_LICENSES=yes poudriere bulk -j 100amd64 sysutils/fusefs-exfat sysutils/exfat-utils
>> [snip]
>> ====>> Building 2 packages using 2 builders
>> ====>> Starting/Cloning builders
>> ====>> Hit CTRL+t at any time to see build progress and stats
>> ====>> [01] Starting build of sysutils/fusefs-exfat
>> ====>> [02] Starting build of sysutils/exfat-utils
>> ====>> [02] Finished build of sysutils/exfat-utils: Ignored: License Microsoft-exFAT needs confirmation, but BATCH is defined
>> ====>> [01] Finished build of sysutils/fusefs-exfat: Ignored: License Microsoft-exFAT needs confirmation, but BATCH is defined
>> ====>> Stopping 2 builders
>> ====>> No package built, no need to update the repository
>> [snip]
>>
>> Setting environment variables doesn't seem to work.
> 
> I have set with success
> 
> NO_IGNORE=yes
> 
> in the make.conf file of the jail to build ports marked with IGNORE.
> Don't know if this helps in this case too.

Necro-post, sorry, but this should be in the archives.

The easiest way is to put DISABLE_LICENSES=yes into make.conf.  Using
NO_IGNORE will result in wasted time building known-broken ports.

Chris


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.