[CFT] x11-servers/xorg-server with initial (GCD) Grand Central Dispatch support

Neil Schroeder gigneil at gmail.com
Wed Apr 23 01:34:17 UTC 2014


Have you tried applying these changes to 1.15?  Almost all the patches fail
- but I have traditionally been very bad at working with large patch files
so I might be going about it wrong...

NS


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:18 AM, Arto Pekkanen <isoa at kapsi.fi> wrote:

> Wow, sounds cool! I just wanted to say thank you for researching something
> not officially researched elsewhere :)
>
> You could fork the current X.org port, and maintain a partial ports tree
> in a separate repository. Then people interested in testing the X.org with
> GCD support could easily use
> http://www.freshports.org/ports-mgmt/portshaker/ to merge your X.org with
> main ports tree.
>
> I've never used portshaker, nor maintained any port myself, but this seems
> like the right way to do it.
>
> On 21.4.2014 15:27, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> > В Mon, 21 Apr 2014 11:30:56 +0200
> > Niclas Zeising <zeising at freebsd.org> пишет:
> >
> >> On 04/20/14 19:05, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> >>> Hi all.
> >>>
> >>> You are tired of frequent friezes xorg server?
> >>> Are you bored messages in /var/log/Xorg.0.log:
> >>> "
> >>> ...
> >>> [mi] EQ overflowing.  Additional events will be discarded until
> >>> existing events are processed. ...
> >>> "
> >>> ?
> >>>
> >>> :)
> >>>
> >>> Then you here! :)
> >>>
> >>> Patch attached :)
> >>>
> >>> If you like, we can continue to develop this area.
> >>
> >> First of all, what is GCD.
> >
> > What is GCD - for example can be read here:
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Central_Dispatch
> >
> >> Second of all, how does this affect the normal way things are done?
> >
> > X server has a single queue of requests, which processed
> > sequentially.
> > Some applications for various reasons, either block the queue or
> > handled too long.
> > And as a result - have dead GUI (server refuses to accept new requests
> > for processing, until the guilty process it works), and messages
> > similar to the following:
> > " ...
> > [mi] EQ overflowing.  Additional events will be discarded until
> > existing events are processed.
> > ...
> > "
> > or any other type of "overflowing"...
> > It regards changes in mi/mieq.c and mi/mipointer.c
> >
> > In this case using GCD queue handled on separate threads.
> > GUI - always responsive.
> >
> > Yes - I suspect that there is a risk of attack on xorg-server where the
> > threads limit is exceeded in the system, but we can modify and somehow
> > eliminate in the future ...
> >
> >> Thirdly, are there any plans to upstream this?
> >
> > Unfortunately I'm not too familiar with the plans xorg community,
> > but xorg still single threaded and it s one of its key weaknesses.
> > I also do not have any information - whether GCD support in other
> > operating systems (likely they are united to advance wayland - not
> > xorg-server) which can be used xorg-server... So I think that these
> > changes will be specific only for FreeBSD.
> >
> > Frankly, I think i do not have arguments and knowledge of the
> > English tongue, that would implement support GCD in upstream :)
> >
> >> Lastly, which versions of xorg-server does this work with?
> >
> > These changes were in xorg-server-1.12.4 and up...
> >
> >
> > Sorry for my english.
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-x11 at freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> >
>
>


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list