stephen at missouri.edu
Thu Oct 3 12:22:40 UTC 2013
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 10/03/2013 04:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:58:56AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto:
>>> Here you are:
>> was referring the the previous one: "[HEADSUP] Stage support for
>> the ports tree". Dunno if it had additional info or this second
>> one is enough.
> I mixed both in one :)
I do appreciate the explanations very much.
I am having a problem with a port in which if NO_STAGE is not set,
then the build part of the process fails. As far as I can tell,
staging should not effect the build part of the process in any way.
So two questions:
1. If I set NO_STAGE=yes in that port, is this going to be a big
problem? It will have to be a work around until I can get the next
2. Any ideas on why staging would effect the build process? The port
includes subpackages that use "./configure; make; make install" and
are supposed to install into $WRKSRC/local, but instead sometimes
installs into $WRKDIR/stage/portname/work/pkgname/local.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the freebsd-ports