Explain staging

Stephen Montgomery-Smith stephen at missouri.edu
Thu Oct 3 12:22:40 UTC 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/03/2013 04:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:58:56AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> Baptiste Daroussin ha scritto:
>>> Here you are: 
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2013-October/086346.html
>>
>>
>>> 
I
>>> 
>> was referring the the previous one: "[HEADSUP] Stage support for
>> the ports tree". Dunno if it had additional info or this second
>> one is enough.
>> 
> I mixed both in one :)

I do appreciate the explanations very much.

I am having a problem with a port in which if NO_STAGE is not set,
then the build part of the process fails.  As far as I can tell,
staging should not effect the build part of the process in any way.
So two questions:
1.  If I set NO_STAGE=yes in that port, is this going to be a big
problem?  It will have to be a work around until I can get the next
question answered:
2.  Any ideas on why staging would effect the build process?  The port
includes subpackages that use "./configure; make; make install" and
are supposed to install into $WRKSRC/local, but instead sometimes
installs into $WRKDIR/stage/portname/work/pkgname/local.

Thanks, Stephen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSTWGBAAoJEC3xK9GaktgHbxUH+QFAGwLtosFLmskl0e/KB3qB
zf+PP7UtZutAllfpFss/v1EgfioLOKq9jhggTeBRUClqj1enPcSeaNC4qEAOg4Zv
oZeRGtPhV4kzUzvUhI0y6Odz1rANjQ1FiRZ0qrSNZXJqp+CLPItAHhiEKvesvUAm
Ic3Z+jpG2XTZVNJIkZM8WUJjdCMNFjphRfyX4v3M4Q8+Q1CIETi+Re4ciiH/G3rX
onuw5cTWR6PGymWfRLRTPaLNRftFXYMmDkhY/mMM3sg6vZVHdq6tSqpDa61qiuQx
W4MsI6SaO/DEkorVcaesEWbNsgffNdN6fOJGCHHP4STcfVb3OE8r2rcpvs3XT3Y=
=K3LU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list