[QAT] r334619: 1x leftovers, 3x success

[Bernhard Fröhlich]

Am 23.11.2013 01:27 schrieb "Gerald Pfeifer" <gerald at pfeifer.com>:
>
> Okay, now I am confused.  How can my workaround work for three quadrants
> of {8.4,9.2} x {amd64,i386} and fail for just one combination?
>
> Gerald
>
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2013, Ports-QAT wrote:
> > Work around ports infrastructure breakage introduced with staging and
> > remove info/gcc46 ourselves.
> >
> > Reported by:  QAT, amdmi3, mandree, bf, dbn
> > PR:           184178
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >   Build ID:          20131122220400-1181
> >   Job owner:         gerald at FreeBSD.org
> >   Buildtime:         2 hours
> >   Enddate:           Sat, 23 Nov 2013 00:19:05 GMT
> >
> >   Revision:          r334619
> >   Repository:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=334619
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >     Port:            lang/gcc46 4.6.4_1,1
> >
> >       Buildgroup:     8.4-QAT/amd64
> >       Buildstatus:   SUCCESS
> >       Log:
https://qat.redports.org//~gerald@FreeBSD.org/20131122220400-1181-230452/gcc-4.6.4_1,1.log
> >
> >       Buildgroup:     8.4-QAT/i386
> >       Buildstatus:   SUCCESS
> >       Log:
https://qat.redports.org//~gerald@FreeBSD.org/20131122220400-1181-230453/gcc-4.6.4_1,1.log
> >
> >       Buildgroup:     9.2-QAT/amd64
> >       Buildstatus:   SUCCESS
> >       Log:
https://qat.redports.org//~gerald@FreeBSD.org/20131122220400-1181-230454/gcc-4.6.4_1,1.log
> >
> >       Buildgroup:     9.2-QAT/i386
> >       Buildstatus:   LEFTOVERS
> >       Log:
https://qat.redports.org//~gerald@FreeBSD.org/20131122220400-1181-230455/gcc-4.6.4_1,1.log
> >
> >
> > --
> > Buildarchive URL: <
https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20131122220400-1181>
> > redports <https://qat.redports.org/>

Hm definitely a good question. The job defines an exact revision as stated
on top of the mail and this is what the builder checks out and builds.

Revision:          r334619

So no good idea at the moment.