single PR vs multiple PR

[Bryan Drewery]

On 11/17/2013 11:46 PM, Koichiro IWAO wrote:
> When maintainer-updating ports, generally, I think one port per one PR
> is a good manner.  Do committers mind if I made a single PR such a case
> applying quite similar changes to multiple port? Which do comitters prefer?
> 
> For example:
> https://redports.org/changeset?reponame=&new=19778%40meta%2Fnet&old=19668%40meta%2Fnet
> 
> 
> Thanks,

If it's for your ports 1 PR is fine if you want. If it's for other
people's ports, it's often much simpler to have multiple PR as each
maintainer will get notified individually automatically.

-- 
Regards,
Bryan Drewery

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20131118/f5dc1065/attachment.sig>