The vim port needs a refresh

[RW]

On Tue, 28 May 2013 02:02:00 +0200
John Marino wrote:

> On 5/28/2013 01:48, RW wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 May 2013 01:13:43 +0200
> >> No.  That's not what those words mean.
> >> Please stop assuming that somebody builds Vim repeatedly and start
> >> assuming it's built for the very first time.
> >
> > Why wouldn't I? Are you seriously suggesting that it's the norm to

> 2. Every software built from source is built "the first time" on each 
> server.

That's not the same as first time, you do have access to other distfile
directories. This is what I suspected from the start, that this is
almost completely about laziness.