Tinderbox Builds

[Muhammad Moinur Rahman]

Hi,
It seems like in that case I can get rid off the GCC versions of
10-CURRENT. Going through redports I can see that they don't run GCC/CLANG
for HEAD except 9.

dim,
Yeap I will keep it for both in 9-RELEASE. Everybody has, it's upto you
that how far you wanna go. :P. I can see that still my resources are 75%
free.

Regards,
Muhammad


On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Dimitry Andric <dim at freebsd.org> wrote:

> On May 8, 2013, at 22:22, Muhammad Moinur Rahman <5u623l20 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Currently I have got 10 builds in my Tinderbox. These are following :
> > 10-CURRENT/amd64 w/clang (-r249422)
> > 10-CURRENT/amd64 w/gcc   (-r249422)
> > 10-CURRENT/i386 w/clang  (-r249422)
> > 10-CURRENT/i386 w/gcc    (-r249422)
> > 8-STABLE/amd64           8.3
> > 8-STABLE/i386            8.3
> > 9-STABLE/amd64 w/clang   9.1
> > 9-STABLE/amd64 w/gcc     9.1
> > 9-STABLE/i386 w/clang    9.1
> > 9-STABLE/i386 w/gcc      9.1
> >
> > As per my understanding I think I am overkilling with the GCC versions as
> > for 9.1 and 10-CURRENT as for 9.1 and 10-CURRENT at -r249422 the default
> > compiler is CLANG. Am I correct or wrong?
>
>
> Clang is only the default compiler on 10-CURRENT.  It will most likely
> never be the default on 9.x.
>
> That said, tinderboxing with both compilers is very nice, because
> sometimes a change can work just fine with the default compiler, but not
> with the other.  Not everybody has the resources to compile that much
> variants... :-)
>
> -Dimitry
>
>