Suggesting a new experimental fork for ports tree
Julian H. Stacey
jhs at berklix.com
Thu Jun 13 14:25:16 UTC 2013
> From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Jo=BEe_Zobec?= <jozze.zepl at gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 20:04:30 +0200
> Apart from the maintainer of the port, there would also be "sub"
> maintainerswhich would be those people who helped patch the port into the
> good shape:
> # make -C /usr/ports/section/someport maintainer
> would return the maintainer (1st address) and additional addresses to turn
> for questions. When the port would be committed to the "good" ports tree,
> sub-maintainers would be left out.
Maybe it'd help to break jozze.zepl's suggestions in to 2 parts ?
- Working & non working ports tree
(No comment from me on that)
- Multiple maintainers
I believe MAINTAINER= value is currently a unitary mail address, which
is [usually] an individual or a freebsd mail list.
I recall before we've discussed adding names of alternates/ extras,
(perhaps comma seperated), & that some who maintain
.mk macros & shell scripts pointed out some difficulties if changed.
Even within the current unchanged syntax,
handfulls of maintainers might already co-operate on a per port basis, with eg
MAINTAINER=port_xyz_maintainers at their-domain.com
port_xyz_maintainers: port_xyz_maint0, port_xyz_maint1
port_xyz_maint0: jack at upthehill.com
port_xyz_maint1: jill at downthehill.com
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com
Reply below not above, like a play script. Indent old text with "> ".
Send plain text. No quoted-printable, HTML, base64, multipart/alternative.
More information about the freebsd-ports