p5-ack renamed ack, no entry in UPDATING

[Bryan Drewery]

On 1/14/2013 2:48 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 14 January 2013 19:27, Eitan Adler <lists at eitanadler.com> wrote:
>> On 14 January 2013 14:04, Vick Khera <vivek at khera.org> wrote:
>>> My apologies. I use portmaster. I don't know why I typed portupgrade in that
>>> original message. Looking at the history file from my shell I see
>>> "portmaster -o textproc/ack p5-ack-1.96_1" was used to correct the fact that
>>> p5-ack was leftover after a "portmaster -a" run.
>>>
>>> I agree duplicating the info in UPDATING would be unnecessary. I did not
>>> have it in my procedures to look into MOVING. I will do that from now on.
>>
>> This should not be required. MOVING is designed for machines to read,
>> not humans.  IMHO portmaster should remove the old version (at least
>> if given an appropriate flag).
> 
> I'm certain it does... Vick, if you can reproduce this error, please
> file a PR against portmaster; this is a bug!
> 
> Chris

This bug was reported to me for this exact port already. It's being
tracked here: https://github.com/portmaster/portmaster/issues/15

Regards,
Bryan Drewery


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 896 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20130114/520daad7/attachment.sig>