ports include /etc/src.conf? i.e. graphics/libfpx

Kimmo Paasiala kpaasial at gmail.com
Wed Feb 13 14:05:43 UTC 2013


On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Tom Evans <tevans.uk at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Yamaya Takashi
> <yamayan at kbh.biglobe.ne.jp> wrote:
>> On 2013/02/13 19:08, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>> Setting only base system source compiler optins in /etc/src.conf, for
>>> instance
>>>
>>> #
>>> CXXFLAGS+=              -stdlib=libc++
>>> CXXFLAGS+=              -std=c++11
>>>
>>>
>>> which do NOT appear in /etc/make.conf, make building port
>>> grahpics/libfpx complaining about unrecognized compiler options.
>>>
>>> As far a sI know, /etc/src.conf is ONLY for building the source tree of
>>> the operating system and make.conf is supposed to contain all stuff
>>> necessary for compiling both world and ports, but /etc/src.conf is world
>>> only.
>>>
>>> Am I wrong?
>>>
>>> Oliver
>>>
>> Yes.
>> Because files/Makefile.bsd includes <bsd.lib.mk>,
>> /etc/src.conf is included.
>>
>>
>
> src.conf(5) says:
>
>   The only purpose of src.conf is to control the compilation of the FreeBSD
>   source code, which is usually located in /usr/src.
>
> Cheers
>
> Tom

If this is taken literally then could it be said that ports that use
bsd.lib.mk are broken because they are using makefile includes from
the source tree?

-Kimmo


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list