If ports@ list continues to be used as substitute for GNATS, I'm unsubscribing
tingox at gmail.com
Thu Dec 19 19:15:20 UTC 2013
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery at freebsd.org> wrote:
> I sincerely disagree and think it's quite rude to users to not accept
> their reports however they send them to us. current@ constantly has
> build failures on it, even automated. There's no reason ports@ shouldn't
> either. It tells everyone that "yes" there is a problem with this port
> and "it's not just me".
We should accept reports from users - ack.
However, there is nothing wrong with educating people about what, how
and why when it comes to problems reports.
If you accept anything, you will only end up with useless garbage.
More information about the freebsd-ports