If ports@ list continues to be used as substitute for GNATS, I'm unsubscribing

[Rodrigo Osorio]

On 19/12/13 21:41 +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:04:10 +0100
> John Marino <freebsd.contact at marino.st> wrote:
> 
> > On 12/19/2013 06:54, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > > you got the point. We have to assume that a port which is not marked
> > > broken has to work. 
> > 
> > I build the entire port tree several times a month.  I can tell you
> > from experience that this assumption is not valid.
> 
> so, you want to say, that all the little problems which are solved
> mainly by people who are not the maintainer should become PRs?

IMHO, it's the only way to reach quality in the port tree with a very
accurate traceability.

regards,
 - rodrigo