If ports@ list continues to be used as substitute for GNATS, I'm unsubscribing

[Anton Shterenlikht]

>Markiyan Kushnir <markiyan.kushnir at gmail.com>:
>
>There's already ports-bugs@ for issues with ports (see the info on
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs).
>And this also would be the correct address for QAT reports, which
>are actually spamming the ports@ list (also imho).
>
>Personally, I do not think that we need yet another list :-).
>
>Cheers
>Marcus

+1

Anton