Where has all the groupware gone.....
Adam Vande More
amvandemore at gmail.com
Tue Apr 23 18:06:08 UTC 2013
Haven't used this.
Also Horde is as hard as you make it. Personally, I think dealing
with all XML and internal tools stuff on Zimbra is worse than Horde
and it's config files and dependencies. That being said, I haven't
used the new Horde stuff in ports, my install is still a couple of
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Paul Pathiakis <pathiaki2 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I have tried building many pieces of groupware so that I can replace MS at various client sites.
> zimbra? No port. (Hardcoded /opt/zimbra)
> kolab? No port. (Hardcoded /kolab - This could work if they got rid of the idiocy of "OpenPKG")
> (A kolab port could easily be done if all the dependencies their rpms were made into a port for it. - It should work fairly easily with ZFS)
> Citadel? No port. Got it working and seems pretty decent.
> SimpleGroupware - Not DB independent, MySQL only
> Tine? Not DB independent, MySQL only (Who does that in this day and age?)
> Horde? Port is cumbersome and very few tips anywhere to get it up and running quickly on FreeBSD (Is there a doc I can't find?)
> Web? Same as Horde
> Egroupware? Sweet... Works nice and seems very useful. Many compliments from people on how well it works.
> Phpgroupware? Not really groupware in the form of the others above.
> I'm just evaluating. I have no affiliation with any. However, the lack thereof when we could be inserting groupware FreeBSD servers in clients... :-)
> Thank you for checking into this and creating real ports and/or documentation.
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
Adam Vande More
More information about the freebsd-ports