csup vs portsnap was: fresh install of kde4 fails ->
japanese/kiten
Jamie Paul Griffin
jamie at kode5.net
Sat Sep 1 10:58:08 UTC 2012
[ RW wrote on Sat 1.Sep'12 at 0:49:54 +0100 ]
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:27:14 -0700
> Jim Pazarena wrote:
>
>
> > Which is the recommended way to stay PORT current? portsnap or csup?
> > I will switch to portsnap, but it is pretty slow compared to csup.
>
> In normal use portsnap should be much faster than csup.
>
> The initial "portsnap extract" is much slower than a normal "update",
> and fetching the first compressed snapshot or updating a really ancient
> one is slower than a normal "fetch" - beyond that portsnap is very fast.
Agreed. After the first run of `portsnap fetch extract`, subsequent fetch and update using portsnap is certainly faster.
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list