[HEADSUP] New framework options aka optionng

[Baptiste Daroussin]

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 09:38:55PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 5/30/2012 9:29 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> > I'm confused by your answer. First, NLS is out of scope for the point
> > I'm making. Second, are you saying that you made DOCS and EXAMPLES into
> > OPTIONS? If so, are you saying that these options will now be presented
> > by default to every user, for every port?
> 
> They are now OPTIONS, but they are not presented to the user by default
> in 'make config'. Just honored and set by default.
> 
> > 
> > If the old NOPORTDOCS and NOPORTEXAMPLES knobs are still honored, and if
> > we are not adding OPTIONS for these to every port, then I certainly have
> > no objection to there being default knobs for DOCS and EXAMPLES that
> > maintainers can choose to use for their ports.
> 
> Correct. They currently are still honored, as well as set if DOCS,
> EXAMPLES, or NLS are not set to maintain compatibility with unconverted
> ports.


Thank you for claritying my confusing mail :)

> 
> You can see this in bsd.options.mk
> 
> Regards,
> Bryan Drewery
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20120531/d4739772/attachment.pgp