[HEADSUP] New framework options aka optionng

[Baptiste Daroussin]

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 05:00:57PM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >> Maybe it would be best if ports which otherwise don't have options, and
> >> for which building docs don't require new dependencies would not put
> >> DOCS and EXAMPLES into options? What do you think?
> > 
> > You can still switch to optionsng, if you don't define DOCS in OPTIONS_DEFINE
> > but just use the if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS} you are using optionsng but won't have
> > the dialog showing up
> 
> That sounds sensible.
> 
> How should users activate/deactivate DOCS and/or EXAMPLES from command
> line in this case? Should they use "make OPTIONS_UNSET=DOCS"?

exactly!
> 
> > anyway yes NOPORTDOCS and NOPORTEXAMPLES should disappear in long term
> 
> Right.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20120530/4560d879/attachment.pgp