[HEADSUP] New framework options aka optionng

Chris Rees utisoft at gmail.com
Sat May 12 21:44:14 UTC 2012


On 12 May 2012 14:18, "Baptiste Daroussin" <bapt at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 08:34:37AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
> > Erwin Lansing ha scritto:
> > > portmgr has been working for long on a new option framework for the
ports to improve some of the deficiencies in the current framework.
> >
> > Great work! Looking quickly at the documentation I have a doubt: while I
> > think most ports handle NOPORTDOCS, I think WITHOUT_NLS is handled only
> > by a small percentage, so, if I have understood correctly, many ports
> > should include OPTIONS_EXCLUDE=NLS. Is it correct?
>
> You are right the documentation is not clear concerning that point.
>
> In this implementation option is enforced at all, only default value are
set by
> the bsd.options.mk which are DOCS and NLS.
>
> crees can you fix that part of the doc? the infomation I sent to you first
> weren't clear about it, sorry.
>
> So currently DOCS and NLS are set on if they are defined by the
> maintainer and only if they are defined by the maintainer.
>
> So no change expected at all from the current defaults.
>

Done.  I'll get the final references to WITH_ etc converted as soon as I
can.

Chris


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list