FAQ on PORTREVISION bump?

[Philip M. Gollucci]

On 03/30/12 13:16, Wesley Shields wrote:
> End users and pointyhat use it constantly.
I might not agree with my statement myself; however its the way thing
are.  Historically even.  If this was not the case, we would bump when
the NON-DEFAULT packages change. (read OPTIONS or different versions of
say perl)

Rather than contradicting me, it would be great if a portmgr@ could
chime in and say one way or the other.



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70  3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci at p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354
Member,                           Apache Software Foundation
Committer,                        FreeBSD Foundation
Consultant,                       P6M7G8 Inc.
Director Operations,              Ridecharge Inc.

Work like you don't need the money,
love like you'll never get hurt,
and dance like nobody's watching.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20120330/bc0e986a/signature.pgp