FreeBSD Port: linux_base-f10-10_4

Svyatoslav Lempert svyatoslav.lempert at
Sat Mar 10 07:11:47 UTC 2012

>>> > eagle: /lib/ version `GLIBC_2.10' not found (required by
>>> > eagle)
>>> >
>>> > I can run version 5.1 in the meantime. But it looks like I will need
>>> > an updated version of linux_base-f10, perhaps an f11, f12 or f13 or f14
>>> > version.
>>> >
>>> > Are there plans to update linux_base-f10 sometime this year ?
>>> Those which have the knowledge to produce a more recent linux_base
>>> port, don't seem to have the time to do this. Those which tell to have
>>> time and express interest to do this, seem to lose interest or time
>>> when they get get aware of what needs to be done (see

We can not run last Fedora 16 on FreeBSD - this is not possible,
because Linux emulation is kernel 2.6.16 and Fedora needs in > 2.6.32
kernel ABI.

I try this in FreeBSD 8.2 (I did a "draft of the port")

# ./bash
FATAL: kernel too old

# file bash
bash: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (GNU/Linux),
dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, stripped

# sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.32
compat.linux.osrelease: 2.6.16 -> 2.6.32

# ./bash
Segmentation fault

I think it should be apply to the CoreTeam

What do you think about the CentOS? It may be more optimal to look on
CentOS 6 userland port?


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list