[HEADSUP] New framework options aka optionng

[Chris Rees]

On Jun 2, 2012 9:29 PM, "Mel Flynn" <rflynn at acsalaska.net> wrote:
>
> On 2-6-2012 15:24, Chris Rees wrote:
> > On Jun 2, 2012 1:57 PM, "Mel Flynn" <rflynn at acsalaska.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12-5-2012 5:41, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> >>
> >>> All the details has been documented and written down on the wiki:
> >>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/Options/OptionsNG
> >>
> >> Sorry to jump in late, but it just occurred to me that I have a valid
> >> case for "zero or 1" multi options or implemented slightly different, a
> >> case for "if single is on, multigroup needs one, else multigroup must
be
> > 0"
> >> The specific case is this:
> >> - User can opt to force runtime dependency on a web server by selecting
> >> one of 4 or none.
> >>
> >
> > Just put a dummy option NOWEBSERVER or something in the singlegroup.
>
> I'll think I'll go for "NONE" to avoid NO/WITHOUT namespaces.

NONEwhat?

Chris