USE_GMAKE fails in QATty?

[Boris Samorodov]

07.07.2012 18:13, Vitaly Magerya пишет:
> On 07/07/2012, Boris Samorodov <bsam at passap.ru> wrote:
>> Seems that Mk/bsd.port.mk assumes that LOCALBASE for gmake
>> is always /usr/local. Please, try the following patch.
>>
>> --- bsd.port.mk   1 Jul 2012 20:57:48 -0000   1.732
>> +++ bsd.port.mk   7 Jul 2012 12:20:17 -0000
>> @@ -1647,7 +1647,7 @@
>>   EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=    unmakeself:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/unmakeself
>>   .endif
>>   .if defined(USE_GMAKE)
>> -BUILD_DEPENDS+=      gmake:${PORTSDIR}/devel/gmake
>> +BUILD_DEPENDS+=      ${LOCALBASE}/bin/gmake:${PORTSDIR}/devel/gmake
>>   CONFIGURE_ENV+=  MAKE=${GMAKE}
>>   .endif
>
> It helps partially: gmake is correctly recognized as installed,
> but building ports with it still does not work since GMAKE is
> still "gmake". This is additionally needed:
>
> --- bsd.commands.mk.orig    2012-07-07 16:59:52.000000000 +0300
> +++ bsd.commands.mk 2012-07-07 16:59:44.000000000 +0300
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
>   FIND?=     /usr/bin/find
>   FLEX?=     /usr/bin/flex
>   FMT?=      /usr/bin/fmt
> -GMAKE?=        gmake
> +GMAKE?=        ${LOCALBASE}/bin/gmake
>   GREP?=     /usr/bin/grep
>   GUNZIP_CMD?=   /usr/bin/gunzip -f
>   GZCAT?=        /usr/bin/gzcat

Yes, this is the right fix. I've overlooked this.

> The problem comes down to the fact that redports/QATty changes
> LOCALBASE, but does not put it into PATH. Are ports are supposed
> to work without $LOCALBASE/bin in PATH? Maybe it's just a glitch
> in redports setup?

All ports should support non standard LOCALBASE. Please, submit
a PR on the case with both patches and ask to assign to portmgr at .
This change needs to be tested at an exp-run.

-- 
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve