"portmaster -o" behaves a little strangely (IMHO)
dougb at FreeBSD.org
Tue Jan 24 21:23:07 UTC 2012
On 01/24/2012 13:18, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> Yes, using origin designators in both places worked. Is this an
> unwritten requirement in the case of the -o option?
No, usually it works with the package name as the second argument (or
even a glob pattern as long as it resolves to a unique package name).
Like I said, the way that the ports framework handles gcc seems to do
things that confuse portmaster. I'm not saying that it's doing anything
wrong, it's just different.
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
More information about the freebsd-ports