tinderbox question (Was: Re: recent portrevision bump for libvpx)
Alex Dupre
ale at FreeBSD.org
Fri Feb 17 10:50:33 UTC 2012
Alex Dupre wrote:
> And consequentially it should be bumped *only if* a direct dependency
> has a library version bump.
This doesn't solve the fact that in 3 days my tinderbox has rebuilt
nearly all ports 4 times. Is there a way to say tinderbox to not rebuild
every ports (without portrevision bump) that depends on a just rebuilt port?
--
Alex Dupre
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list