tinderbox question (Was: Re: recent portrevision bump for libvpx)

Alex Dupre ale at FreeBSD.org
Fri Feb 17 10:50:33 UTC 2012

Alex Dupre wrote:
> And consequentially it should be bumped *only if* a direct dependency
> has a library version bump.

This doesn't solve the fact that in 3 days my tinderbox has rebuilt 
nearly all ports 4 times. Is there a way to say tinderbox to not rebuild 
every ports (without portrevision bump) that depends on a just rebuilt port?

Alex Dupre

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list