helping out INDEX builds. best practices?

[Doug Barton]

On 02/07/2012 17:50, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> On 02/08/12 01:48, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 02/07/2012 17:43, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>>> if a certain port needs to be kept in sync with another portversion,
>>> other than putting a comment in the main port "# must bump portversion
>>> in port..." where you have two maintainers, is there a better way to do
>>> this?
>>
>> Take a look at editors/xxe and editors/xml2rfc-xxe
> 
> devel/py-subversion might be a better example since it includes
> Makefile.common specifically from subversion.

Yes, that's exactly the same mechanism used in xml2rfc-xxe. The only
difference is that it's not a slave port.


Doug

-- 

	It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20120208/8ef266fa/signature.pgp