helping out INDEX builds. best practices?

Doug Barton dougb at
Wed Feb 8 01:55:10 UTC 2012

On 02/07/2012 17:50, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> On 02/08/12 01:48, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 02/07/2012 17:43, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>>> if a certain port needs to be kept in sync with another portversion,
>>> other than putting a comment in the main port "# must bump portversion
>>> in port..." where you have two maintainers, is there a better way to do
>>> this?
>> Take a look at editors/xxe and editors/xml2rfc-xxe
> devel/py-subversion might be a better example since it includes
> Makefile.common specifically from subversion.

Yes, that's exactly the same mechanism used in xml2rfc-xxe. The only
difference is that it's not a slave port.



	It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url :

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list