not for arch? use arch? don't care arch?

[Michael Scheidell]

what is todays favorite way of doing this:
(i sent this question to submitter):


>  I had a question, and just for the logs:
>
>  you removed this in the Makefile, but in your fix log, you didn't
>  mention that you got it to compile on sparc64.
>
>  -.if ${ARCH} == "sparc64"
>  -BROKEN= Does not compile on sparc64
>  -.endif
>  -
>
>  did you mean to remove that test or does it compile on sparc64?


<http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/164373>

his reply is this:

"The ChangeLog mentioned some sparc64 fixes, so it's worth giving it a
try again, but the port depends on boost-libs now which is marked as
broken on sparc64, so it cannot actually be tested."

So, how do you want me to handle this?

NOT_FOR_ARCHS sparc64?

or just let PH die trying to include boost-libs?


-- 
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation

    * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
    * Best Intrusion Prevention Product
    * Hot Company Finalist 2011
    * Best Email Security Product
    * Certified SNORT Integrator

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). 
For Information please see http://www.spammertrap.com/
______________________________________________________________________