java/openjdk6 fails to build..
lists at eitanadler.com
Fri Dec 28 20:50:30 UTC 2012
On 28 December 2012 15:24, Greg Lewis <glewis at eyesbeyond.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 07:27:22PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 21 December 2012 19:16, David Demelier <demelier.david at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Yes, I wanted to answser, but the man says that MAKE_JOBS are disabled by
>> > default, I tried to build with MAKE_JOBS=1 and it works, the problem did
>> > appear when MAKE_JOBS=6 was set. Can you reproduce the issue?
>> I want to mark this MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and remove the current hack
>> Any objection from java@ ?
>> > I had MAKE_JOBS=6 in my /etc/make.conf instead of MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER though
>> Exactly. MAKE_JOBS is not user-settable. MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER is. IMHO
>> MAKE_JOBS should start with an _.
> I think that's right. I have no objection. I think whats in openjdk7
> is closer to what it should be.
What is in openjdk7 seems bogus and it isn't clear why it is there:
is defined implying that MAKE_JOBS should always be 1 (and -j never set)
but it does some weird things with the global variables
MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER and DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS.
Can the generic handling in b.p.m not work?
IMHO MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes should be defined and either b.p.m or b.java.m
should be handling the special build code.
More information about the freebsd-ports