Upgrading ports problem with portupgrade(pkgng)

Baptiste Daroussin bapt at FreeBSD.org
Mon Dec 24 01:25:37 UTC 2012


On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 09:39:02PM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 23/12/2012 21:05, Beach Geek wrote:
> > And as I understand,  poudriere must be used instead of portupgrade to
> > create packages?
> 
> That's not right.
> 
>    poudriere is an offline pkg building system, designed to build
>    packages in a sandbox, and then create a pkgng repository accessible
>    to various client machines.  You can use it locally to maintain a
>    single machine, but that's sort of missing the point. It only works
>    with pkgng, although I believe you can run it on a non-pkgng machine
>    to create a repo for maintaining other pkgng-enabled machines.

Last part is not entirely true, poudriere can work work both pkgng and
pkg_install it is not pkgng only. yes it can run on a non-pkgng machine, but it
still needs pkgng to be install on the host (installed not necessary used). and
it can work on a pkgng machine to build pkg_install packages without the need of
the pkg_install tools on the host.

It can also be used to maintain a single machine, by creating the repository of
packages and once done you can simply install/upgrade them using pkgng. It is
very convenient, and easy to do, because it is fast (poudriere is heavily
parallelized) it allows the users to really upgrade things when they all succeed
at building, meaning your system is always safe. It allows you to allows be png
or pcre upgrade proof, because such upgrade will be detected by poudriere
without the need of a bump in portrevision. If the user end up with a missing
libpcre.so.1 a simple pkg install -fR pcre will fix the situation almost
immediatly.

> 
>    portmaster and portupgrade cover basically the same territory.
>    They're designed to maintain the locally installed package set on a
>    machine.  To that end, both of them are wrappers around the ports,
>    and facilitate installing packages by compiling the relevant port
>    source code.  The can also use binary packages, typically from a
>    FreeBSD ftp server.  Initially they used pkg_tools packages, but
>    both have been modified to work with pkgng packages as well.
> 
>    pkgng is a package registry application and a binary package
>    manager.  It doesn't understand the ports.  However, if you have
>    access to a suitable source of pre-compiled packages you can use
>    just pkgng to manage those, and have no need for portmaster or
>    portupgrade.  poudriere is intended to provide that 'suitable
>    source.' although once the official pkg build cluster gets up and
>    running, users should be able to use that instead.
> 
> 	Cheers.
> 
> 	Matthew
> 

regards,
Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20121224/2808142d/attachment.sig>


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list