raptor: should there be a note in UPDATING?

Raphael Kubo da Costa rakuco at FreeBSD.org
Tue Aug 21 23:23:38 UTC 2012

Robert Backhaus <robbak at robbak.com> writes:

> I just had a problem building liblrdf. The cause was raptor-1 was
> still installed. Checking UPDATING shows nothing that mentions raptor
> after the KDE update last November.
> Does there need to a note in UPDATING to uninstall raptor?

It seems more appropriate to fix the port: according to the build log
posted in <201208211544.18566.lumiwa at gmail.com> (the other liblrdf
thread), -I/usr/local/include is being passed before
-I/usr/local/include/raptor2, and it is likely that the source code
#includes <raptor.h>, which is installed by both raptor and raptor2
(albeit into different directories).

Someone (TM) should check whether the first include is really necessary,
or if the code can't include <raptor2/raptor.h>, or if
-I/usr/local/include/raptor2 can't be passed before

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list